I tried to think back to my early reading days to think if I can ever recall anything like this in my experience, but of course my memory isn’t so great. I wonder what mine would have looked like, and I can’t help but think that mine may have been somewhat like the example from “Claire” (appropriately) from Clay. My speculation is that I was very much a self-corrector. I was never a particularly fast or flawless reader as “Emma” was in her example, but I know I tried very hard to be perfect, which I think would have shown through on a running record if I had one from when I was beginning to read.
The fact that you can tell so much about how a child is learning and processing reading from the marks made word by word in a running record is absolutely brilliant. I loved that bits that the “teacher” wrote after each sample running record. I am sure it takes a lot of practice, but it seems so incredibly practical that it only makes sense to use this technique. I know Clay mentioned that it’s best to start with average readers, but I think if you mastered the process enough, this could be very helpful to every variety of learner. My only question is that I couldn’t help but wonder how English language learners fit into the mix. Is there any sort of special mark for different pronunciations? What happens if the student says the word in their primary language?
I like how you explained the running records as sort of a mathematical process to assess a students reading progress/skills, I hadn't thought of it that way! I agree reading could be a difficult task to grade, running records would definitely make it an easier process (granted you understand how to do them properly lol) In response to your question about the ELL running records, I imagine it would be MUCH harder than a native English speaker because of all the added pauses and second tries a student would most likely have to take.
ReplyDeleteThe slower the child, the easier it tends to be.. so pauses aren't a problem.
ReplyDeleteWhen I have done running records with children with speech or language difficulties, I might mark them, but if I know they have an issue with a sound (R for example), I don't usually document it. If I notice changes in pronoun use or tense use of course it gets marked as the words are different.. and then I say.. the child demonstrates the following language patterns (which are/not noticeable in their conversational speech).
Does this make sense? We can talk more about this. As Claire says it is all about patterns.. so if the child has consistent patterns you want to note those, but you will usually have already figured out if this is a reading issue? or something else?